Skip to content

How we decide

We back behavioural evidence, not identity labels.

A founder does not qualify because of a category. They qualify because there is evidence that they have built the operating habits adversity tends to teach. Here is what we actually look for, and what we deliberately ignore.

The rubric

Five questions we hold a conversation against.

None of these is a box to tick. Together they describe a way of operating — the machinery a founder has built to keep building when the path is unclear.

01

Constraint history

Has the founder had to build through limited capital, unstable systems, institutional friction, or repeated resets? We are looking for moderate, formative constraint — not maximum hardship. The goal is evidence of building under real pressure, not a contest of suffering.

02

Recovery speed

When something broke, how quickly did they absorb the lesson, change behaviour, and re-engage? We listen for what changed in their process after a setback — not only how it felt. Learning speed is one of the clearest distinctions between founders who endure and those who stall.

03

Resourcefulness

Can they create momentum without excess spend — bootstrapping intelligently, mobilising time, networks, and existing assets? This is among the most research-backed parts of the thesis, and one of the most visible in a first conversation.

04

Agency

Do they behave as if they can influence outcomes, or do they narrate their life as something that only happens to them? Internal locus of control and self-efficacy are repeatedly linked to entrepreneurial resilience. We are listening for ownership.

05

Network-building

Do they turn weak ties into support, customers, hiring leads, and distribution? Stronger stakeholder engagement amplifies the relationship between resilience and success. Resourcefulness with people is as telling as resourcefulness with capital.

What we down-weight

  • The brand of the school or the last employer.
  • The warmth of the introduction.
  • The polish of the story over the substance of the process.
  • Personal wealth as a proxy for staying power.

What we protect against

  • Romanticising trauma, or rewarding suffering for its own sake.
  • Treating a background as automatic qualification.
  • Mistaking persistence for direction.
  • Asking founders to burn resilience rather than spend it well.

Read how this looks in practice in the founder notes.

Founder notes